ISO
15189:2012 was designed to outline the “requirements for competence and quality
that are particular to medical laboratories.” Laboratory competence and quality
are critical in patient diagnosis and care to ensure they meet the need of the
clinicians & patients. Gaining accreditation to ISO 15189:2012 will assure clinicians
employing your services that they will be benefiting from accurate results
which have been measured against a consistent standard. You could benefit too
from cost savings and enhanced end-user satisfaction.
Certification
by an agency or organization, as defined by ISO, is a “procedure by which a
third party gives written assurance that a product, process or service conforms
to specified requirements”. Accreditation on the other hand is a “procedure by
which an authoritative body gives formal recognition that a body or person is
competent to carry out specific tasks.”
ISO
15189 is intended as an accreditation standard and not for certification. For
accreditation, the rules require that the accreditation process be carried out
by authorized third party organizations: i.e. a person or body that is
recognized as being independent of the parties involved; in this case, someone
who is independent of the laboratory or the laboratory’s parent organization
ISO
15189 is a voluntary standard. Governments may adopt the standard as their
country standard such as the one adopted below by the Philippine Accreditation
Bureau of the Department of Trade and Industry.
Clause
|
Requirements
of Accreditation / Description
|
4
|
Management
Requirements
|
4.1
|
Organization
and Management responsibility
|
4.1.1
|
Organization
|
4.1.1.1
General
|
Does
the laboratory management system cover work carried out in:
– Sites away from its permanent facilities?
– Permanent facilities?
– Associated temporary facilities?
– Mobile facilities?
|
4.1.1.2
Legal
Identity
|
Is
the laboratory or the organization legally responsible?
|
4.1.1.3
Ethical
conduct
|
Does
the laboratory / management have arrangement to ensure that:
a. No involvement in any activities that
would diminish confidence in the laboratory’s competence, impartiality,
judgement or operational integrity.
b. Management and personnel are free from
– Undue internal and external commercial
pressure
– Financial pressure?
– Other pressure that influences that may
adversely affect the quality of work?
c. Where potential conflicts in competing
interests may exist, they shall be openly and appropriately declared
d. Appropriate procedures to ensure human samples,
tissues or remains according to relevant legal requirements?
e. Policies and procedures to
confidentiality of information?
|
4.1.1.4
Laboratory
Director
|
Is
the laboratory directed by a person or persons with competence and delegated
responsibility for the services provided?
|
Do
the responsibilities of the laboratory / facility director or designees
include professional, scientific, consultative, advisory, organizational,
administrative, and educational matters?
|
|
Does
the laboratory director (or designates for delegated duties) have the
necessary competence, authority and resources in order to fulfill the
requirements of this international standard?
|
|
The
duties and responsibilities of the laboratory director (or designate/s) shall
be documented and include the following:
a. Provide effective leadership of the
medical laboratory service, including budget planning and financial
management.
b. Relate and function effectively with
appropriate accrediting agencies, appropriate administrative officials, the
healthcare community, and the patient population served, and providers of
formal agreements, when required;
c. Ensure that there are appropriate number
of staff,
d. Ensure the implementation of the quality
policy,
e. Implement a safe laboratory environment,
f. Serve as contributing member of the
medical staff,
g. Ensure the provision of clinical advice,
h. Select and monitor laboratory suppliers,
i. Select referral laboratories and monitor
the quality of their services.
j. Provide professional development programs
for Laboratory Staff.
k. Define, implement and monitor standards
of performance and quality improvement.
l. Monitor all work performed in the
laboratory.
m. Address any complaints, request or
suggestion from staff and/or users of laboratory services.
n. Design and implement a contingency plan
to ensure that essential services are available. (contingency plan should be
periodically tested)
o. Plan and direct research and development,
where appropriate
(The
laboratory / facility director need not perform all responsibilities
personally. However, it is the laboratory / facility director’s
responsibility for the overall operation and administration of the laboratory
/ facility, for ensuring that quality services are provided for patients.)
|
|
4.1.2
|
Management
responsibility
|
4.1.2.1
Management
commitment
|
The
laboratory management shall provide evidences of its commitment to develop
and implement the quality management system and to continually improve
effectiveness by:
a. Communicating to laboratory personnel the
importance of meeting the needs and requirements of users as well as
regulatory and accreditation requirements.
b. Establishing quality policy;
c. Ensuring that quality objectives and
planning are established;
d. Defining the responsibilities, authorities
and interrelationships of all personnel.
e. Establishing communication processes;
f. Appointment of quality manager;
g. Conducting management review;
h. Ensuring that all personnel are competent
to perform their assigned activities;
i. Ensuring availability of adequate
resources to enable the proper conduct of pre–examination, examination and
post–examination activities.
|
4.1.2.2
Needs
of user
|
Do
the medical laboratory / facility services, including appropriate
interpretation and advisory services meet the needs of patients and all
personnel responsible for patient care?
|
4.1.2.3
Quality
policy
|
Is
the Quality Policy:
– defined under the authority of laboratory
/ facility management
– and include the following:
a. Appropriate to the purpose of the organization.
b. The laboratory’s commitment to good
professional practice, examinations that are fit for intended use,
c. Compliance with the requirements of this
International Standards, and continual improvement of the quality of
laboratory services,
d. A framework for establishing and
reviewing quality objectives,
e. Communicated and understood within the
organization,
f. Reviewed for continuing suitability.
|
4.1.2.4
Quality
Objectives and Planning
|
The
laboratory management establish quality objectives that are measurable and
consistent with the quality policy.
Does
it meet the needs and requirements of the users, at relevant functions and
levels within the organization?
The
planning of the quality management system shall meet the requirements and the
quality objectives.
|
4.1.2.5
Responsibility,
authority and interrelationships
|
Ensure
that responsibilities, authorities and interrelationships are defined,
documented and communicated.
Appointment
of person(s) responsible for each laboratory function.
Appointment
of deputies for key managerial and technical personnel.
|
4.1.2.6
Communication
|
Are
there records of items discussed in communications and meetings with the
laboratory staff?
Are
records kept of items discussed in communications and meetings?
Is
appropriate communication process established between the laboratory and its
stakeholders in relation to laboratory’s pre–examination, examination and
post–examination processes and quality management system?
|
4.1.2.7
Quality
Manager
|
The
Laboratory shall appoint Quality Manager
Does
the responsibilities and authority include:
a. Ensuring that processes needed for the
quality management system are established, implemented and maintained,
b. Reporting to the laboratory management,
at a level which decision are made to laboratory policy, objectives and
resources, on the performance of the quality management system and any need
for improvement?
c. Promoting the awareness of users’ needs
and requirements throughout the laboratory organization?
|
4.2
|
Quality
management system
|
4.2.1
General
Requirement
|
The
laboratory shall establish, document, implement and maintain quality
management system and continually improve its effectiveness.
The
laboratory shall:
a. Determine the processes needed for the
quality management system and ensure their application throughout the
laboratory;
b. Determine the sequence and interaction of
these processes;
c. Determine criteria and methods needed to
ensure that both the operation and control of these processes are effective.
d. Ensure the availability of resources and
information necessary to support the operation and monitoring of these
processes;
e. Monitor and evaluate these processes;
f. Implement actions necessary to achieve
planned results and continual improvement of these processes.
|
4.2.2
|
Documentation
requirements
|
4.2.2.1
General
|
Quality
management system documentation shall include:
a. Statement of Quality Policy and Quality
Objectives
b. Quality manual
c. Procedures and records required by ISO
15189
d. Documents and records, determined by the
laboratory to ensure the effective planning, operation and control of its
processes.
e. Copies of applicable regulations,
standards and other normative documents.
|
4.2.2.2
Quality
Manual
|
The
laboratory shall establish and maintain Quality Manual that includes:
a. Quality policy or makes reference to it
b. Scope of the quality management system
c. Organization and management structure
d. Roles and responsibilities of laboratory
management (including the laboratory director and quality manager)
e. Document structure
f. Documented policies for the quality
management system and reference to the managerial and technical activities.
All
laboratory staff shall have access to and be instructed on the use and
application of the quality manual and the referenced documents.
|
4.3
|
Document
Control
|
The
laboratory shall control documents required by the quality management system.
Ensure
unintended use of any obsolete document is prevented.
Shall
have documented procedure to ensure the following conditions are met:
a. All documents, including those maintained
in computerized system are reviewed and approved by authorized personnel
before issue.
b. All documents are identified to include:
· Title
· Unique identifier on each page
· Date of current edition and/or edition
number
· Page number to total number of pages
· Authority to issue
c. List of documents with current authorized
editions and their distributions.
d. Only current authorized editions of
applicable documents are available at points of use.
e. Procedure and authorities for the
amendment of documents by hand. Amendments are clearly marked, initialed and
dated and a revised document is issued within a specified time period.
f. Changes to documents are identified
g. Documents remain legible.
h. Documents are periodically reviewed and
updated at a frequency that ensures that they remain fit for purpose.
i. Obsolete controlled documents are dated
and marked as obsolete.
j. At least on copy of an obsolete
controlled document is retained for specified requirements.
|
|
4.4
|
Service
Agreements
|
4.4.4.1
Establishment
of service agreements
|
The
laboratory shall have procedures established and maintained for review of
agreements.
The
following conditions shall be met when the laboratory enters into an
agreement:
a. The requirements, including the methods
to be used are:
·
Defined
·
Documented
·
Understood
b. Capability and resources meet the
requirements
c. Laboratory personnel have the skills and
expertise necessary for the performance of the intended examination.
d. Appropriate method is selected and
capable of meeting the customer’s needs.
e. Customers and users are informed of
deviations from the agreement.
f. References shall be made to any work
referred by the laboratory.
|
4.4.2
Review
of service agreements
|
Are
records of these reviews and any significant changes maintained?
If
the contract needs to be amended after the work commence:
– Is the same contract review process
repeated?
– Are any amendments communicated to all
affected parties?
|
4.5
|
Examination
by referral laboratories
|
4.5.1
Selecting
and evaluating referral laboratories and consultants
|
The
laboratory shall have documented procedures available to evaluate and select:
– Referral laboratories?
– Consultants who provide second opinions and
interpretation for complex testing in any discipline.
The
procedure shall ensure that the following conditions are met:
a. Laboratory management responsible for
selecting and monitoring the quality of referral laboratories and
consultants. Referral laboratory or consultant is competent to perform the
requested examinations.
b. Arrangements with referral laboratories
and consultants periodically reviewed and evaluated.
c. Records of such periodic reviews are
maintained.
d. Maintains register of all referral laboratories
and consultants.
e. Requests and results of all samples
referred are kept for a pre–defined period.
|
4.5.2
Provision
of examination results
|
The
referring laboratory, and not the referral laboratory/facility, shall be
responsible to ensure that examination results and findings are provided to
the clinician making the request.
The
report shall have all the essential elements of the results if it is reported
by the referral laboratory, without alterations that could affect any
clinical interpretations.
The
report shall indicate which examinations were performed by a referral
laboratory or consultant.
The
author of any additional remarks shall be clearly identified.
|
4.6
|
External
services and supplies
|
The
laboratory shall have procedure for selection purchasing of services,
equipment, reagents and consumable supplies it uses that affect the quality
of its services.
The
laboratory shall select and approved suppliers.
Criteria
for selection of suppliers shall be established.
A
list of selected and approved suppliers of equipment, reagents and
consumables shall be maintained.
Purchasing
information shall describe the requirements for the product or service to be
purchased. The laboratory shall monitor the performance of suppliers.
|
|
4.7
|
Advisory
services
|
The
laboratory shall establish arrangements for communicating with users on the
following:
a. Advising on choice of
· Examination and use of the services
· Required type of samples
· Clinical indications
· Limitations of examination procedures
· Frequency of requesting the examination
b. Advising on individual clinical cases,
c. Professional judgements on the
interpretation of the results of examinations,
d. Promoting the effective utilization of
laboratory services,
e. Consulting on scientific and logistic
matters such as instances of failure of sample(s) to meet acceptance
criteria.
|
|
4.8
|
Resolution
of complaints
|
The
laboratory shall have documented procedure for the management of complaints
or other feedback.
Records
of all complaints, investigation and action taken shall be maintained.
Identification
and control of nonconformities
|
|
The
laboratory shall have documented procedure to identify and manage
nonconformities in any aspects of the quality management system, including
pre–examination, examination or post–examination processes.
The
procedure shall ensure that:
a. Responsible person for handling
nonconformities are designated.
b. Define immediate actions taken.
c. The extent of non–conformity is
determined
d. Examinations are halted and reports
withheld as necessary;
e. The medical significance of the non–conforming
tests is considered and requesting clinicians informed where appropriate.
f. Non–conforming tests results and
examinations already released are recalled?
g. The responsibility for authorization of
the resumption of work is defined?
h. Details of the non–conformity is
documented and recorded and reviewed at regular specified intervals to detect
trends and initiate preventive actions?
If
evaluation of the non–conformity determines recurrence, then are procedures
established and implemented to identify, document and eliminate the
causes(s).
Corrective
action to be taken shall be determined and documented.
|
|
4.10
|
Corrective
action
|
The
laboratory shall take corrective actions appropriate to the effect of the
nonconformities encountered.
The
laboratory shall have documented procedure for:
a. Reviewing nonconformities
b. Determining root causes of
nonconformities
c. Evaluating the need for corrective action
to ensure that nonconformities do not recur,
d. Determining and implementing corrective
actions needed
e. Recording the results of corrective
action taken
f. Reviewing the effectiveness of the
corrective action taken.
|
|
4.11
|
Preventive
action
|
The
laboratory shall determine action to eliminate the causes of potential
nonconformities to prevent its occurrence.
The
laboratory shall have documented procedures for:
a. Reviewing of laboratory data and
information to determine potential nonconformities.
b. Determining root cause(s) of potential
nonconformities.
c. Evaluating of the need for preventive
action to prevent occurrence of nonconformities.
d. Determining and implementing of
preventive action needed.
e. Recording of the results preventive
action taken.
f. Reviewing the effectiveness of the
preventive action taken.
|
|
4.12
|
Continual
improvement
|
The
laboratory shall continually improve the effectiveness of the quality
management system through the use of management reviews, corrective actions
and preventive actions with its intention, as stated in the quality policy
and quality objectives.
Improvement
activities shall be directed at areas of highest priority based on risk
assessments.
Action
plans for improvement shall be:
–
developed
–
documented
–
implemented, as appropriate?
The
effectiveness of the actions taken shall determine through a focused review
or audit of the area concerned.
The
laboratory management shall ensure the following:
· The laboratory participates in continual
improvement activities that encompass relevant areas and outcomes of patient
care?
· Where there are opportunities for
improvement, are these issues addressed regardless of where they occur?
· Improvement plans and related goals shall
be communicated to staff
|
|
4.13
|
Control
of records
|
The
laboratory / facility shall establish and maintain documented procedures for:
· Identification
· Collection
· Indexing
· Access
· Storage
· Maintenance
· Amendment
· Safe disposal of quality and technical
records?
Records
shall be created concurrently with performance of each activity that affects
the quality of the examination.
(Records
can of any form/type of medium as long as they are readily accessible,
protected from unauthorized alterations and in accordance to local, national
or regional legal requirements.)
The
date and, where relevant, time of amendments to records captured along with
the identity of personnel making the amendments.
The
date and, where relevant, time of amendments to records captured along with
the identity of personnel making the amendments.
The
laboratory shall define retention time of all records pertaining to the
quality management system, including pre–examination, examination and post–examination
processes. The retention time may vary, however, reported results defined to
allow records to be retrievable for as long as medically relevant or as
required by regulation.
The
facilities shall have suitable environment for storage of records to:
· Prevent damage or deterioration?
· Prevent loss?
· Prevent unauthorized access?
|
|
Records
shall include, at least, the following:
a. Supplier selection and performance and
changes to the approved supplier list
b. Staff qualification, training and
competency records
c. Request forms (including the patient
chart or medical record if used as the request form),
d. Records of receipt of samples in the
laboratory, e.g. accession records
e. Information on reagents and materials
used for examination (lot documentation, certificates of supplies, package
inserts)
f. Laboratory work–books or work sheets,
g. Instrument printouts and retained date
and information
h. Examination results and reports,
i. Instrument maintenance records including
internal and external calibration records
j. Calibration functions and conversion
factors
k. Quality control records,
l. Incident records and action taken,
m. Accident records and action taken
n. Risk management records
o. Nonconformities identified and immediate
or corrective action taken
p. Preventive action taken
q. Complaints and action taken
r. Records of internal and external audits
s. Inter–laboratory comparison of
examination results
t. Records of quality improvement activities
u. Minutes of meetings that record decisions
made about the laboratory’s quality management system
v. Records of management reviews
(All
these records shall be available for laboratory management review)
|
|
4.14
|
Evaluation
of audits
|
4.14.1
General
|
The
evaluation and internal audit process shall be planned and implemented to:
a. Demonstrate that laboratory’s processes
are conducted in a manner that meets the needs and requirements of users?
(e.g. user’s feedback)
b. Ensure conformity to the quality
management system
c. Continually improve the effectiveness of
the quality management system
Are
the results of evaluation and improvement activities included as part of
management review?
|
4.14.2
Periodic
review of requests, and suitability of procedures and sample requirements
|
Authorized
personnel shall periodically review the examinations provided by the
laboratory to ensure they are clinically appropriate for the requests
received.
The
laboratory shall periodically review its:
· Sample volume
· Collection device
· Preservative requirement for blood,
urine, other body fluids, tissue and other sample types to ensure neither
insufficient nor excessive amounts of samples are collected and samples are
properly collected to preserve the sample
|
4.14.3
Assessment
of users feedback
|
The
laboratory shall seek user feedback on the laboratory’s performance and
whether the service has met the needs and requirements of users.
Records
of such information and action taken shall be retained and reviewed.
|
4.14.4
Staff
suggestion
|
The
laboratory shall encourage staff make suggestions for the improvement of any
aspect of the laboratory services.
Suggestions
shall be
· Evaluated
· Implemented as appropriate
· Feedback provided to the staff
Records
of suggestions and action taken shall be maintained
|
4.14.5
Internal
Audit
|
The
laboratory shall conduct internal audits at planned intervals and covers all
activities in the quality management system (including pre–examination,
examination and post–examination procedures) to determine:
· Conformance to the requirements stated in
ISO 15189, relevant PAB documents and internal laboratory procedures
· Implementation, effectiveness and
maintenance of the quality management system.
Are
such audits carried out by personnel trained to assess the performance of managerial
and technical processes of the quality management system?
How
does the laboratory ensure objectivity and impartiality of the audit process?
Are we selected auditors, wherever resources permit, independent of the
activity to be audited?
Does
the audit program include:
· The status and importance of the
processes, the technical and management areas to be audited
· The results of previous audits
The
procedures for internal audit shall define the criteria, scope, frequency,
methodology, responsibilities and requirements for planning and conducting
audits, and for reporting and maintaining records.
The
laboratory shall have a documented procedure to define responsibilities and
requirements for planning and conducting audits, and for reporting results
and maintaining records.
The
personnel responsible for the area being audited shall ensure that
appropriate action is promptly undertaken when nonconformities are
identified. Corrective actions shall be taken without delay to eliminate the
causes of the detected nonconformities.
|
4.14.6
Risk
Management
|
The
laboratory shall evaluate the impact of work processes and potential failures
on examination results that affect patient safety.
The
laboratory shall modify processes to reduce or eliminate the identified risks
and document decisions and action taken.
|
4.14.7
Quality
indicators
|
The
laboratory shall establish quality indicators to monitor and evaluate the
performance of the critical aspects of pre–examination, examination, post –
examination procedures.
The
process of monitoring the quality indicators shall be planned which include:
·
Objectives
·
Methodology
·
Interpretation
·
Limits
·
Action plan
·
Duration of measurement
Are
the indicators periodically reviewed?
Are
turnaround times for each of its examinations that reflect clinical needs
established?
Does
the laboratory periodically evaluate its performance to meet the established
turnaround time?
(The
laboratory should establish quality indicators for systematically monitoring
and evaluating the laboratory’s contribution to patient care)
|
4.14.8
Review
of external organization
|
When
external organizations indicate the laboratory has nonconformities or
potential nonconformities, the laboratory shall take appropriate immediate
actions and as appropriate corrective action or preventive action to ensure
continued compliance with ISO 15189:2012.
The
laboratory shall retain records of reviews by external organizations and of
the corrective actions and preventive actions taken.
|
4.15
|
Management
Review
|
4.15.1
General
|
The
laboratory management shall review the quality management system at planned
intervals to ensure continuing suitability, adequacy and effectiveness in
support of patient care
|
4.15.2
Review
input
|
The
input to management review shall include information from the results of
evaluation of at least the following:
a. Periodic review of requests, suitability
of procedures and sample requirements
b. Assessment of user feedback
c. Staff suggestions
d. The outcomes of recent internal audits?
e. Risk management
f. Use of quality indicators
g. Reviews by external organizations
h. Inter–laboratory comparison programs (PT
/ EQA performance)
i. Monitoring and resolution of complaints
j. Supplier evaluation
k. Identification and control of
non–conformities
l. Results of continual improvement
(including current status of corrective actions and preventive actions)
m. Follow up actions from previous
management reviews
n. Changes in volume and scope of work,
personnel and premises that could affect the quality management system
o. Recommendation for improvement, including
technical requirements
|
4.15.3
Review
activities
|
The
management review shall:
· Analysis of the causes of non–conformities,
trends and patterns that indicate process problems
· Include assessment of opportunities for
improvement and the need for changes to the quality management system,
including its quality policy and quality objectives.
· Objectively evaluate the quality and
appropriateness of the laboratory’s contribution to patient care, to the
extent possible.
|
4.15.4
Review
output
|
The
laboratory shall document the decisions made and action taken during
management review related to:
· Improvement of the effectiveness of the
quality management system and its processes
· Improvement of services to users
· Resource needs
The
findings and actions arising from the management review shall be recorded and
communicated to the laboratory staff.
The
actions from management reviews shall be carried out within an appropriate
and agreed timescale.
|
5
|
Technical
Requirements
|
5.1.1
General
|
The
laboratory / facility management shall have documented procedures for
personnel management.
The
management shall maintain records for all personnel to indicate compliance
with requirements.
|
5.1.2
Personnel
qualification
|
The
laboratory management shall document personnel qualification for each
position.
· The qualification shall reflect
appropriate education, training, experience and demonstrated skills needed,
and be appropriate for the task performed.
· The personnel making judgments with
reference to examination shall have the applicable theoretical and practical
background and experience.
|
5.1.3
Job
description
|
The
laboratory shall have job descriptions that describe responsibilities,
authorities and task for all personnel.
|
5.1.4
Personnel
introduction to the organizational environment
|
The
laboratory shall have program to introduce new staff to the organization, the
department or area in which the person will work, the terms and conditions of
employment, staff facilities, health and safety requirements (including fire
and emergency), and occupational health services.
|
5.1.5
Training
|
The
laboratory shall provide training for all personnel in the following areas:
a. The quality management system
b. Assigned work processes and procedures
c. The applicable laboratory information system
d. Health and safety, including the
prevention or contamination of the effects of adverse incidents
e. Ethics
f. Confidentiality of patient information
Personnel
undergoing training shall be supervised.
The
effectiveness of the training program shall be periodically reviewed.
|
5.1.6
Competence
assessment
|
The
laboratory shall assess the competence of each trained person to perform
assigned managerial or technical tasks according to established criteria.
Reassessment
shall take place at regular interval. Retraining shall be provided, when
necessary.
Competency
of laboratory staff can be assessed by using any combination or all of the
following approaches under the same conditions as the general working
environment:
a. Direct observation of routine work
processes and procedures, including all applicable safety practices
b. Direct observation of equipment
maintenance and function checks
c. Monitoring the recording and reporting of
examination results
d. Review of work records
e. Assessment of problem solving skills
f. Examination of specially provided
samples, such as previously examined samples, inter–laboratory comparison
materials, or split samples)
|
5.1.7
Review
of staff performance
|
Does
the laboratory consider the needs of the laboratory and of the individual
during the reviews of staff performance in order to maintain or improve the
quality of service and encourage productive working relationships?
|
5.1.8
Continuing
education and professional development
|
Continuing
education program shall be available for personnel participating in
managerial and technical processes.
Personnel
shall take part in continuing education.
Effectiveness
of the continuing education program shall be periodically reviewed.
Personnel
shall take part in regular professional development or other professional
liaison activities.
|
5.1.9
Personnel
records
|
The
laboratory shall maintain the following records:
a. Educational and professional
qualifications
b. Copy of certifications or license, when
applicable,
c. References from previous employment,
d. Job descriptions,
e. Orientation records
f. Training in current job tasks
g. Competency assessment
h. Records of continuing education and
achievements,
i. Reviews of staff performance
j. Records of accidents and exposure to
occupational hazards
k. Records of immunization status (when
relevant to assigned duties)
|
5.2
|
Accommodation
and environment conditions
|
5.2.1
General
|
The
laboratory workplace shall be adequate to carry out quality work, quality
control procedures, and safety of personnel and patient care services.
Is
there evidence that the laboratory director determined the adequacy of the
laboratory’s space?
The
laboratory resources shall be maintained in a functional and reliable
condition.
Are
provisions made for appropriate primary sample collection and examinations
sites, which are different from permanent laboratory facility?
|
5.2.2
Laboratory
and office facilities
|
The
laboratory and associated office facilities shall provide an environment suitable
for the tasks to be undertaken, to ensure the following conditions are met:
a. Access to laboratory / facility
controlled;
b. Medical information, patient samples, and
laboratory resources safeguarded from unauthorized access;
c. Laboratory / facility for examination
allow correct performance of examinations? Example, energy resources,
lighting, ventilation, noise, water, waste disposal and environment
conditions.
d. Communication system within the
laboratory appropriate to the size and complexity of the facility to allow
effective transfer of information;
e. Safety facilities and devices provided
and functioning regularly verified.
|
5.2.3
Storage
facilities
|
Storage
space and conditions shall be provided to ensure continuing integrity of
sample materials, documents, equipment, reagents, consumables, records,
results and any other items that could affect the quality of examination
results.
Are
clinical samples and materials stored in a manner to prevent cross
contaminations?
Are
storage and disposal facilities for dangerous materials appropriate to the
hazards of the materials and as specified by applicable requirements?
|
5.2.4
Staff
facilities
|
The
laboratory shall have adequate access to washrooms, supply of drinking water
and facilities for storage of personal protective equipment and clothing.
|
5.2.5
Patient
sample collection facilities
|
Do
the patient sample collection facilities have separate reception / waiting
and collection areas?
Are
considerations made for accommodating patient disabilities, comfort, and
privacy when primary sample collection facilities are provided?
Is
the environment in which the primary samples collection procedures are
performed suitable so that it does not invalidate the results or adversely
affect the quality of the examination?
Are
appropriate first aid materials available and maintained for both patient and
staff at sample collection facilities?
|
5.2.6
Facility
maintenance and environmental conditions
|
The
laboratory premises shall be maintained in a functional and reliable
condition.
Work
areas shall be clean and well maintained.
The
laboratory / facility shall monitor, control and record environment
conditions as required by relevant specification or where they may influence
the quality of sample, results and/or the health of staff.
(Due
attention shall be paid to light, sterility, dust, noxious or hazardous
fumes, electromagnetic interference, radiation, humidity, electrical supply,
temperature, sound and vibration levels and workflow logistics, as
appropriate to the activities concerned so as not to invalidate the results
or adversely affect the required quality of examination)
There
shall be effective separation between neighboring areas where incompatible
activities are performed.
Appropriate
measures shall be taken to prevent cross–contamination where examination
procedures pose a hazard or where the work may be affected or influenced by
not being separated (e.g. nucleic acid amplifications).
The
laboratory shall provide a quiet and uninterrupted work environment where it
is needed.
|
5.3
|
Laboratory
Equipment
|
Note:
instruments, reference materials, consumables, reagents, and analytical
systems are included as laboratory equipment, as applicable.
|
|
5.3.1.1
General
|
Does
the laboratory has documented procedure for selection, purchasing and
management of equipment?
Is
the laboratory / facility furnished with all the items of equipment required
for its services (including primary sample collection, sample preparation and
processing, examination and storage)?
Where
the laboratory / facility needs to use equipment outside its permanent
control, does the laboratory management ensure that the requirements of ISO
15189 are met?
The
laboratory shall replace equipment as needed to ensure its quality of
examination results.
|
5.3.1.2
Equipment
acceptance testing
|
The
equipment shall be verified upon installation and before use to show its
capability to achieve the necessary performance and compliance with
requirements relevant to any examinations concerned.
Each
item of equipment shall be uniquely labelled, marked or otherwise identified.
|
5.3.1.3
Equipment
instructions use
|
The
equipment shall be operated by trained and authorized personnel at all times.
Are
current instructions, issued by manufacturer, on the use, safety and
maintenance of equipment, including relevant manuals and directions for use,
readily available?
The
laboratory shall have procedures for safe handling, transport, storage and
use of equipment to prevent its contamination and deterioration.
|
5.3.1.4
Equipment
calibration and metrological traceability
|
The
laboratory shall have documented procedure for the calibration of equipment
that directly or indirectly affects examination results.
The
procedure includes:
a. Reference to conditions of use and
manufacturer’s instructions;
b. Recording of the metrological
traceability of the calibration standard and traceable calibration of the
item equipment;
c. Verification of the required measurement
accuracy and function of the measuring system at defined intervals;
d. Recording of the calibration status and
date of recalibration;
e. Ensuring that calibration factors are
correctly updated after calibration;
f. Safeguard to prevent adjustment or
tampering that might invalidate examination results.
Metrological
traceability shall be to a reference material or reference procedure of the
higher metrological order available.
Where
this is not possible or relevant, does the laboratory use other means for
providing confidence in the results such as (but not limited to):
· Use of certified reference materials
· Examination or calibration by another
procedure
· Mutual consent standards or methods which
are clearly established, specified, characterized and mutually agreed upon by
all parties concerned?
|
5.3.1.5
Equipment
maintenance and repair
|
Is
there a documented program of preventive maintenance which, at a minimum,
following the recommendation from the manufacturer?
Is
equipment maintained in safe working conditions and in working order?
Are
procedures in place to ensure examination of electrical safety, emergency
stop devices, and safe handling and disposal of chemical, radioactive and
biological materials by authorized persons?
Manufacturer’s
specifications or instructions or both shall be used, as appropriate.
Is
defective equipment taken out of service, clearly labeled and not used until
it has been repaired and shown by verification to meet specified acceptance
criteria?
Is
the effect of this defect on previous examinations examined and institute immediate
action or corrective action?
Are
reasonable measure taken to decontaminate equipment prior to service, repair
or decommissioning, provide suitable space for repairs and provide
appropriate personal protective equipment?
When
equipment goes outside the direct control of the laboratory/facility, does
the laboratory ensure its performance is verified before the equipment is
returned to service?
|
5.3.1.6
Equipment
adverse incident reporting
|
Are
adverse incidents and accidents that can be attributed to specific equipment
investigated and reported to manufacturer and appropriate authorities, as
required?
|
5.3.1.7
Equipment
records
|
Are
the following records of each item of equipment contributing to the
performance of examinations maintained?
a. Identity of the equipment,
b. Manufacturer’s name, model and serial
number or other unique identification,
c. Manufacturer’s/supplier’s contact
information,
d. Date received and date of entered into
service,
e. Location,
f. Condition when received (e.g. new, used
or reconditioned),
g. Manufacturer’s instructions,
h. Records that confirmed the equipment’s
initial acceptability for use when it is incorporated in the laboratory,
i. Maintenance carried out and the schedule
for preventive maintenance,
j. Equipment performance records that
confirm the equipment’s ongoing acceptability for use,
k. Damage to, or malfunction, modification
or repair, of the equipment.
Does
the performance records referred in (j) include copies of reports /
certificates of all calibrations and/or verifications including dates, time
and results, adjustments, acceptance criteria and due date of next
calibration and/or verification, to fulfill part or this entire requirement?
Are
the records maintained and readily available for the life span of the equipment
or for any time period required by national, regional and local regulations?
|
5.3.2
|
Reagents
and consumables
|
5.3.2.1
General
|
Does
the laboratory has documented procedure for reception, storage, acceptance
testing and inventory management of reagents and consumables?
|
5.3.2.2
Reagents
and consumables – reception and storage
|
Where
the laboratory is not the receiving facility, does the laboratory verify that
the receiving location has adequate storage and handling capabilities to
maintain purchased items in a manner that prevents damage or deterioration?
Is
the storage of received reagents and consumables in accordance to
manufacturer’s specification?
|
5.3.2.3
Reagents
and consumables – acceptance testing
|
Is
new formulation of examination kits with changes in reagents or procedure, or
new lot or shipment verified for performance before use in examinations?
Are
consumables that can affect the quality of examinations verified for
performance before use in examinations?
|
5.3.2.4
Reagents
and consumables – inventory management
|
Does
the laboratory establish an inventory control system for reagents and
consumables?
Does
the inventory control system segregate uninspected and unacceptable reagents
and consumables for those that have been accepted for use?
|
5.3.2.5
Reagents
and consumables – instruction for use
|
Are
instructions for use of reagents and consumables, including those provided by
the manufacturer, readily available?
|
5.3.2.6
Reagents
and consumables – adverse incident reporting
|
Are
adverse incidents and accidents that can be attributed to specific reagents
or consumables investigated and reported to manufacturer and appropriate
authorities, as required?
|
5.3.2.7
Reagents
and consumables – records
|
Are
the following records (but not limited to) of each reagents and consumables
contributing to the performance of examinations maintained:
a. Identity of the reagent or consumable
b. Manufacturer’s name, and batch code / lot
number
c. Manufacturer’s / supplier’s contact
information
d. Date received, expiry date, and date of
entering into service and, where applicable, the date the material was taken
out of service,
e. Condition when received (e.g. accepted or
damaged),
f. Manufacturer’s instructions,
g. Records that confirmed the reagent’s or
consumable’s initial acceptability for use,
h. Performance records that confirm the
reagent’s or consumable’s ongoing acceptance of use.
Where
the laboratory uses reagents prepared or completed in–house, does the records
also include reference to the person(s) undertaking their preparation and the
date of preparation?
|
5.4
|
Pre–examination
process
|
5.4.1
General
|
Does
the laboratory has documented procedures and information of pre–examination
activities to ensure the validity of the results of examinations?
|
5.4.2
Information
for patients and users
|
Is
the following information available for patients and users of the laboratory
services?
a. Location of the laboratory
b. Types of clinical services offered by the
laboratory including examinations referred to other laboratories
c. Opening hours of the laboratory
d. Examinations offered by the laboratory
including, as appropriate, information concerning samples required, primary
sample volumes, special precautions, turnaround time, (which may also be
provided in general categories or for groups of examinations), biological
reference intervals, and clinical decision values,
e. Instruction for completion of Request
Form
f. Instruction for preparation of the
patient
g. Instruction for patient–collected samples
h. Instructions for transportation of
samples, including any special handling needs,
i. Any requirements for patient consent
(e.g. consent to disclose clinical information and family history to relevant
healthcare professionals, where referral is needed
j. The laboratory’s criteria for accepting
and rejecting samples,
k. A list of factors known to significantly
affect the performance of examination or the interpretation of the results,
l. Availability of clinical advice on
ordering of examinations and on interpretation of examination results,
m. The laboratory’s policy on protection of personal
information,
n. The laboratory’s complaint procedure
Is
information that includes an explanation of the clinical procedure to be
performed available for patients and users to enable informed consent?
Are
importance of provision of patient and family information, where relevant
(e.g. for interpreting genetic information results), explained to the patient
and user?
|
5.4.3
Request
from information
|
The
Request Form or Electronic equivalent shall allow space for the inclusion of,
but not limited to:
a. Patient identification, gender, date of
birth, location / contact details of the patient and unique identification of
the patient;
b. Name or other unique identifier of
physician or other person legally authorized to order examinations or use
medical information together with the destination for the report. If the
requesting clinician’s address provided as part of the request form
information;
c. Type of primary sample and the anatomic
site of origin, where relevant;
d. Examination requested;
e. Clinical information relevant to the
patient, which should include gender and date of birth, as a minimum, for
interpretation purposes;
f. Date and time of primary sample
collection, and
g. Date and time of receipt of samples by
the laboratory.
The
laboratory shall have documented procedure to handle verbal requests for
examinations that includes providing confirmation by Request Form or
electronic equivalent within a given time.
The
laboratory shall be willing to cooperate with users or their representatives
in clarifying the user’s request.
|
5.4.4
|
Primary
sample collection and handling
|
5.4.4.1
General
|
The
laboratory shall have documented procedures for proper collection and
handling of primary samples.
The
procedure(s) shall be available to those responsible for primary sample
collection regardless if the collectors are laboratory staff.
Where
the users require deviations, exclusions from or additions to, the documented
collection procedure, are the deviations recorded and included in all
documents containing examination results and communicated to the appropriate
personnel?
In
emergency situations, consent might not be possible; under these
circumstances it is acceptable to carry out necessary procedures; provided
they are in patient’s best interest.
|
5.4.4.2
Instructions
for pre–collection activities
|
Does
the laboratory have instructions to include the following?
a. Completion of Request Form or electronic
request;
b. Preparation of the patient (e.g.
instructions to caregivers and phlebotomists)?
c. Type and amount of primary sample to be
collected (e.g., phlebotomy, skin puncture, blood, urine and other body
fluids) with descriptions of the primary sample containers and any necessary
additives?
d. Special timing of collection, if
required?
e. Clinical information relevant to or
affecting sample collection, examination performance or result interpretation
(e.g., history of administration of drugs)?
|
5.4.4.3
Instructions
for collection activities
|
Does
the instruction for collection activities include the following:
a. Positive identification in detail of the
patient from whom a primary sample is collected?
b. Verification that patient meets pre–examination
requirements (e.g. fasting status, medication status, sample collection at
predetermined time or time intervals, etc.)?
c. Instructions for collection of primary
blood and non – blood samples, with descriptions of the primary sample
containers and any necessary additives?
d. Where primary sample is collected as part
of clinical practice, determination and communication to appropriate clinical
staff on the information and instructions for primary sample containers, any
necessary additives and sample transport conditions?
e. Instructions for labelling of primary
samples in a manner that provides an unequivocal link with the patients from
whom they are collected.
f. Identification of the collector and
collection date, and when needed, recording of the collection time
g. Instructions for proper storage
conditions before collected samples are delivered to the laboratory
h. Safe disposal of materials used in the
collection allowed additional examinations?
|
5.4.5
Sample
transportation
|
Do
the laboratory’s instructions for post–collection activities include
packaging of samples for transportation?
Does
the laboratory monitor how the samples are transported to the laboratory for
the following?
a. Within a time frame appropriate to the
nature of the requested examinations and the laboratory discipline concerned?
b. Within a temperature range specified in
the primary sample collection manual and with the designated preservatives to
ensure the integrity of samples?
c. In a manner that ensures the integrity of
the samples and safety for the carrier, the general public and the receiving
laboratory, in compliance with established requirements?
|
5.4.6
Sample
reception
|
The
laboratory’s procedure for sample reception shall ensure that the following
conditions are met:
a. Samples unequivocally traceable, by request
and labelling, to an identified patient or site.
b. Laboratory–developed and documented
criteria for acceptance or rejection of samples applied.
c. Where there is uncertainty in the
identification of the primary sample, or sample instability due to delay in
transport or inappropriate container(s), insufficient sample volume, or when
the sample is clinically critical or irreplaceable and the laboratory chooses
to process the sample, does the final report indicate the nature of the
problem, and where applicable, that caution is required when interpreting the
result?
d. All sample received are recorded in an
accession book, worksheet, computer or other comparable system and include:
· Date and time of receipt and/or
registration of samples
· Identity of person receiving the sample,
whenever possible
e. Authorized personnel shall evaluate
received samples to ensure that they meet the acceptance criteria relevant
for the requested examination.
f. Where relevant, are there instructions
for the receipt, labelling, processing and reporting of samples specifically
marked as urgent?
Do
the instructions include:
· Details of special handling of the
Request Form and the primary sample?
· Mechanism of transfer of the primary
sample to the examination area of the laboratory?
· Any rapid processing mode to be used?
· Any special reporting criteria to be
followed?
All
portions of the primary sample shall be unequivocally traceable to the
original primary sample.
|
5.4.7
Pre–examination
handling, preparation and storage
|
The
laboratory shall have procedures and appropriate facilities to:
· Secure patient samples
· Prevent deterioration, loss or damage
during pre–examination activities, and during handling, preparation and
storage
The
laboratory procedure shall include time limits for request of additional
examinations or further examinations on the same primary sample.
|
5.5
|
Examination
process
|
5.5.1
|
Selection,
verification and validation of examination procedure
|
5.5.1.1
General
|
The
laboratory shall select examination procedures which have been validated for
their intended use.
The
identity of persons performing activities in examination processes shall be
recorded.
Does
the specified requirements (performance specifications) for each examination
procedure relate to the intended use of that examination?
|
5.5.1.2
Verification
of examination procedures
|
Validated
examination procedures used without modifications shall be subject to
independent verification by the laboratory before being introduced in routine
use.
The
laboratory shall obtain information from the manufacturer / method developer
for confirming the performance characteristics of the procedure.
Does
the independent verification by the laboratory, through obtaining of
objective evidence, confirm that the performance claims for the examination
procedure have been met and relevant to the intended use?
Is
there documented verification procedure? Is the result obtained recorded?
Are
the verification results reviewed by appropriate authority and is the review
documented?
|
5.5.1.3
Validation
of examination procedures
|
The
laboratory shall validate the examination procedures derived from:
a. Non–standard methods,
b. Laboratory designed or developed methods
c. Standard methods used outside their
intended scope
d. Validated methods subsequently modified
The
validations shall be as extensive as necessary and confirm, through provision
of objective evidence (in the form of performance characteristics), that the
specific requirements for the intended use of the examination have been
fulfilled.
Is
there documented validation procedure? Is the result obtained recorded?
Are
the validation results reviewed by appropriate authority and is the review
documented?
When
changes are made to a validated examination procedure, are the impact of the
changes documented and, when appropriate, a new validation shall be carried
out.
|
5.5.1.4
Measurement
uncertainty of measured quantity values
|
The
laboratory shall determine measurement uncertainty for each measurement
procedure used to report measured quantity values on patient’s samples.
The
laboratory shall define the performance requirements for the measurement
uncertainty of each measurement procedure and regularly review estimates of
measurement uncertainty.
The
laboratory shall consider measurement uncertainty when interpreting measure
quantity values.
Upon
request, does the laboratory make its estimation of measurement step but do
not report a measure quantity value, the laboratory should calculate the
uncertainty of the measurement step where it has utility in assessing the
reliability of the examination procedure or has influence on the reported
result.
|
5.5.2
Biological
reference intervals or clinical decision values
|
The
laboratory shall define the biological reference intervals or clinical
decision values, document the basis for reference intervals or decision
values and communicate this information to users.
Are
appropriate changes made, when a particular biological reference interval or
decision value is no longer relevant for the population served? Are the
changes communicated to the users?
When
the laboratory changes an examination procedure or pre–examination procedure,
are the associated reference intervals and clinical decision values reviewed?
|
5.5.3
Documentation
of examination procedures
|
Examination
procedures shall be documented.
They
shall be written in a language commonly understood by the staff in the
laboratory. It shall be available in appropriate locations.
Any
condensed document format (e.g. card files or similar used systems) shall
correspond to the documented procedure.
Are
all documents associated with the performance of examinations, including
procedures, summary documents, condensed documents format and product
instructions for use, subjected to document control?
In
addition to document control identifiers, does documentation include, when
applicable, the following:
a. Purpose of the examination
b. Principle and method of the procedure
used for examinations
c. Performance characteristics
d. Type of sample (e.g. plasma, serum,
urine)
e. Patient preparation
f. Type of container and additive
g. Required equipment and reagents
h. Environmental and safety controls
i. Calibration procedures (metrological
traceability)
j. Procedural steps
k. Quality control procedures
l. Interferences (e.g., lipemia, hemolysis,
bilirubinemia) and cross reaction
m. Principle of procedure for calculating
results, including, where relevant, measurement uncertainty of measured
quantity values
n. Biological reference intervals or
clinical decision values
o. Reportable interval of examination
results
p. Instructions for determining quantitative
results when results are not within the measurement interval
q. Alert /critical values, where appropriate
r. Laboratory clinical interpretation
s. Potential sources of variation
t. References
If
the laboratory intends to change an existing examination procedure such that
results or their interpretations could be significantly different, the
implications shall be explained to users of the laboratory services after
validating the procedure.
|
5.6
|
Ensuring
quality of examination results
|
5.6.1
General
|
The
laboratory shall ensure that quality of examinations by performing them under
defined conditions. Appropriate pre– and post– examination processes shall be
implemented.
The
laboratory shall not fabricate any results.
|
5.6.2
|
Quality
Control
|
5.6.2.1
General
|
The
laboratory /facility shall design internal quality control procedures that
verify the attainment of the intended quality of results.
|
5.6.2.2
Quality
control materials
|
The
laboratory shall use quality control materials that react to the examination
system in a manner as close as possible to patient samples.
The
quality control materials shall be periodically examined with a frequency
that is based on the stability of the procedure and the risk of harm to the
patient from an erroneous result.
|
5.6.2.3
Quality
control data
|
The
laboratory shall have a procedure to prevent the release of patient results
in the event of quality control failure.
When
the quality control rules are violated and indicate that examinations results
are likely to contain clinically significant errors, the results shall be
rejected and relevant patient samples re–examined after the error condition
has been corrected and within specification performance is verified.
The
laboratory shall evaluate the results from patient samples that were examined
after the last successful quality control event.
The
quality control data shall be reviewed at regular intervals to detect trends
in examination performance that may indicate problems in the examination
system.
The
preventive actions taken shall be recorded when such trends are noted.
|
5.6.3
|
Inter–laboratory
Comparison
|
5.6.3.1
Participation
|
The
laboratory shall participate in inter–laboratory comparison programs
appropriate to the examination and interpretations of examination results.
The
laboratory shall:
· Monitor the results of the inter–laboratory
comparison programs
· Participate in the implementation of
corrective actions when pre–determined performance criteria are not
fulfilled.
The
laboratory shall establish a documented procedure for inter–laboratory
comparison participation that include:
· Defined responsibilities and instructions
for participation?
· Performance criteria that differs from
the criteria used in the inter–laboratory comparison program
Inter–laboratory
comparison program chosen by the laboratory shall, as far as possible,
provide clinically relevant challenges that mimic patient samples and have
the effect of checking the entire examination process including pre– and post–
examination procedures, where possible.
|
5.6.3.2
Alternative
approaches
|
Whenever
inter–laboratory comparison is not available, the laboratory shall develop
other approaches and provide objective evidence for determining the
acceptability of examination results.
Wherever
possible, this mechanism shall utilize appropriate materials.
Examples
of such materials may include:
· Certified reference materials
· Samples previously examined;
· Materials from cell or tissue
repositories;
· Exchange of samples with other
laboratories
· Control materials that are tested daily
in inter–laboratory comparison programs
|
5.6.3.3
Analysis
of interlaboratory comparison samples
|
The
laboratory shall integrate inter–laboratory comparison samples into the
routine workflow in a manner that follows, as much as possible, the handling
of patient samples.
The
laboratory shall ensure that:
· Inter–laboratory comparison samples are examined
by personnel who routinely examine patient samples using the same procedures
as those used for patient samples.
· No communication with other participants
in the inter–laboratory comparison program about sample data until after the
date for submission of the data.
· Inter–laboratory comparison samples are
not sent for confirmatory examinations before submission of the data,
although this would routinely be done with patient samples.
|
5.6.3.4
Evaluation
of laboratory performance
|
The
performance in inter–laboratory comparisons shall be reviewed and discussed
with relevant staff.
When
predetermined performance criteria are not fulfilled, does the laboratory:
· Involve the staff in the implementation
and recording of corrective actions?
· Monitored the effectiveness of the
corrective action?
· Evaluated the returned results for trends
that indicate potential nonconformities and take appropriate preventive
action?
|
5.6.4
Comparability
of examination results
|
There
shall be defined means of comparing procedures, equipment and methods used
and establishing the comparability of results for patient samples throughout
the clinically appropriate intervals.
This
is applicable to the same or different procedures, equipment, different
sites, or all of these.
(In
the particular case of measurement results that are metrologically traceable
to the same reference, the results are described as having metrological
comparability providing that calibrators are commutable).
The
laboratory shall notify users of any differences in comparability of results
and discuss any implications for clinical practice when measuring systems
provide different measurement intervals for the same measurand and when
examination methods are changed.
The
laboratory shall document, record and as appropriate, expeditiously act upon
results from the above comparisons.
Problems
or deficiencies identified shall be acted upon and records of actions
retained.
|
5.7
|
Post–examination
process
|
5.7.1
Review
of results
|
The
laboratory shall have procedure to ensure that authorized personnel
systematically review the results of examinations and evaluate them in
conformity of the clinical information available regarding the patient and
authorize the release of the results.
Review
criteria shall be established, approved and documented for procedure that
involves automatic selection and reporting.
|
5.7.2
Storage,
retention and disposal of clinical samples
|
The
laboratory shall have a documented procedure for:
· Identification
· Collection
· Retention
· Indexing
· Access
· Storage
· Maintenance
· Safe disposal of clinical samples
The
laboratory shall define the retention time of clinical samples. Retention
time shall be defined by:
· Nature of sample
· The examination
· Any applicable requirements/regulation
Safe
disposal of samples shall be carried out in accordance with local regulations
or recommendations for waste management.
|
5.8
|
Reporting
of Results
|
5.8.1
General
|
The
results of each examination shall be reported accurately, clearly, unambiguously
and in accordance with any specific instructions in the examination
procedures.
The
laboratory shall define the format and medium of the report (electronic or
paper) and the manner in which it is to be communicated from the laboratory.
The
laboratory shall have procedures in place to ensure correctness of
transcription of laboratory results.
The
reports shall have the necessary information for the interpretation of the
examination results.
The
laboratory shall have a process for notifying the requester when an
examination is delayed that could compromise patient care.
|
5.8.2
Report
attributes
|
The
laboratory shall ensure that the following report attributes effectively
communicate laboratory results and meet users’ needs:
a. Comments on samples quality that might
compromise examination results,
b. Comments regarding sample suitability
with respect to acceptance / rejection criteria,
c. Critical results, where applicable and
d. Interpretative comments on results, where
applicable, which may include the verification of the interpretation or
automatically selected and reported results in the final report are
effectively communicated and meet the user’s needs.
|
5.8.3
Report
content
|
The
report should include but not limited to:
a. Clear unambiguous identification of the examination
including, where appropriate, the examination procedure;
b. The identification of the laboratory /
facility that issued the report;
c. Identification of all examinations that
have been performed by a referral laboratory;
d. Identification and location of the
patient on each page;
e. Name or other unique identifier of the
requester and the requester’s contact details;
f. Date of primary sample collection, and
time where available and relevant to patient care;
g. Source and system (or primary sample
type),
h. Measurement procedure, where appropriate;
i. Results of the examination including SI
units or units traceable to SI units, or other applicable units;
j. Biological reference intervals, clinical decision
values, or diagrams / nomograms supporting clinical decision values, where
applicable.
(Under some circumstances, it may be appropriate
to distribute lists or tables of biological reference intervals to all users
and sites where reports are received).
k. Interpretations of results, where appropriate;
l. Other comments such as cautionary or
explanatory notes (e.g., quality or adequacy of primary sample, which may
have compromised the result, results/interpretations from referral
laboratories, use of developmental procedure);
m. Identification of examinations undertaken
as part of a research or development program and for which no specific claims
on measurement performance are available;
n. Identification of the person(s) reviewing
the results and authorizing the release of the report (if not contained in
the report, readily available when needed);
o. Date and time of release of report, if
not on the report, shall be readily accessible when needed;
p. Page number of total number of pages
(e.g. “page 1 of 5)
|
5.9
|
Release
of Results
|
5.9.1
General
|
The
laboratory / facility shall have documented procedures for the release of
examination results, including details of who may release results and to
whom.
The
procedures shall ensure the following conditions are met:
a. When quality of the primary sample
received is unsuitable for examination, or could have compromised the result,
it is indicated in the report.
b. When examination results fall within
established “alert” or “critical” intervals,
· Immediate notification of physician (or
other clinical personnel responsible for patient care) including referral
laboratories results.
· Records of actions take are maintained
including
ᵒ Date and time
ᵒ Responsible laboratory staff member
ᵒ Person notified
ᵒ Examination results conveyed
ᵒ Any difficulty encountered in meeting
this requirement
c. Results are legible, without mistakes in
transcription, and reported to persons authorized to receive and use the
information.
d. When results are transmitted as interim
report, the final report is always forwarded to the requester.
e. There are processes for ensuring that
results distributed by telephone or electronic means reach only authorized
recipients. Reports provided orally shall be followed by a written report.
There shall be records of all oral results provided.
|
5.9.2
Automated
selection and reporting of results
|
If
the laboratory implements a system for automated selection and reporting of results,
it shall establish documented procedure to ensure that:
a. Criteria for automated selection and
reporting are defined, approved, readily available and understood by the
staff?
b. Criteria are validated for proper
functioning before use and verified after changes to their system that might
affect their functioning?
c. A process is in place to indicate the
presence of sample interferences (e.g. hemolysis, icterus, lipemia) that may
alter the results of the examination;
d. A process to incorporate analytical warning
messages from the instruments into the automated selection and reporting
criteria, when appropriate;
e. Results selected for automated reporting
are identifiable at the time of review before release and that date and time
of selection are included;
f. A process for rapid suspension of
automated selection and reporting is in place.
|
5.9.3
Revised
reports
|
There
shall be written instructions regarding the revision of reports. So that:
a. Revised report is clearly identified as
revision and includes reference to the date and patient’s identity in the
original report.
b. User regarding is made aware of the
revision;
c. The revised record shows the time and
date of change and the name of person responsible for the change;
d. The original report entries in the record
when revisions are made.
Results
used for clinical decision – making revised shall be retained in subsequent
cumulative reports and clearly identified as having been revised.
When
the reporting system cannot capture amendments, changes or alterations, a
record of such shall be kept.
|
5.10
|
Laboratory
Information Management
|
5.10.1
General
|
The
laboratory/ facility shall have access to the data and information needed to
provide a service which meets the needs and requirements of the users.
The
laboratory shall have documented procedure to ensure confidentiality of
patient information is maintained at all times.
|
5.10.2
Authorities
and Responsibilities
|
The
laboratory shall ensure that the authorities and responsibilities for the
management of the information system are defined, including the maintenance
and modification to the information system(s) that may affect patient care.
The
laboratory shall define authorities and responsibilities of all personnel who
use the system, in particular those who:
a. Access patient data and information;
b. Enter patient data and examination
results;
c. Change patient data or examination
results;
d. Authorize to release examination results
and reports.
|
5.10.3
Information
system management
|
The
system(s) used for the collection, processing, recording, reporting, storage
or retrieval of examination data and information shall be:
a. Validated by supplier and verified for
functioning by the laboratory before introduction, with any changes to the
system authorized, documented and verified before implementation?
b. Documented to include day to day
functioning of the system and be readily available to authorize users?
c. Protected from unauthorized access
d. Safeguarded against tampering or loss
e. Operated in an environment that complies
with supplier specifications or provides conditions which safeguard the
accuracy of manual recording and transcription;
f. Maintained in a manner that ensures the
integrity of the data and information and includes the recording of system
failures and the appropriate immediate and corrective actions,
g. In compliance with national or
international requirements regarding data protection.
The
laboratory shall verify the results of examinations, associated information
and comments are accurately reproduced, electronically and in hard copy where
relevant, by the information systems external to the laboratory intended to
directly receive the information (e.g. clinics’ computer systems, fax
machines, e–mail, personal web devices or websites.)
When
new examination or automated comments are implemented, the laboratory shall
verify that the changes are accurately reproduced by the information systems
external to the laboratory intended to directly receive information from the
laboratory.
The
laboratory shall have documented contingency plans to maintain services in
the event of failure or downtime in information system that affects the
laboratory’s ability to provide service.
When
the information system(s) are managed and maintained offsite or subcontracted
to an alternative provider, the laboratory management shall be responsible
for ensuring that the provider or operator of the system complies with all
applicable requirements of this International Standard.
|
No comments:
Post a Comment